Opioid Crisis

Endo International and Arnold Porter Opioid Discovery Abuses

As opioid addiction and death escalate, defense counsel conceals the evidence.

 

 

by Mark York, Editor

Endo International’s opioid defense counsel Arnold & Porter,  is facing  civil contempt charges in the New York state court opioid trial currently underway In Re Opioids Litigation, Suffolk County Supreme Court Justice Jerry Garguilo. Reflecting the gravity of the issue, Arnold & Porter has hired lawyers from three powerhouse commercial firms including Steptoe & Johnson, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and Robert & Robert, as well as Endo’s counsel Mayer Brown claiming “it’s just an oversight.”

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21041792-400000_2017_in_re_opioid_litigation_v_per_order_order_to_show_cause_8444

Judge Garguilo signed an order to show cause August 11, on why Arnold & Porter and its client Endo Pharmaceuticals should not be help for contempt. Garguilo ordered both Endo and their trial counsel to appear on the show cause order on August 25.

This major discovery abuse was discovered in another state court opioid case, in Tennessee, where under agreed multi-district litigation (MDL) rules, various jurisdictions overseeing opioid cases have agreements in place that discovery in one jurisdiction, counts as discovery in others dockets. The State of New York, Nassau and Suffolk Counties  filed a motion to show cause for default judgment and other relief based on the discovery dispute.

Plaintiff’s court filing in support of default judgement:

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF NEW YORK’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

The August 25, 2021 Rule Hearing will be simulcast live via our https://masstortnews.live/ trial streaming service.

To watch the August 25, 2021 hearing go to masstortnews.live

To watch the New York trial live on a daily basis visit MassTortNews.live to access and watch the New York Opioid trial live in the State Of New York, et al vs.  Opioid Manufacturers and Distributors.

Click To View

Password: 0628

The case is In Re Opioid Litigation, Suffolk Supreme Court, No. 400000/2017.

For Suffolk: Jayne Conroy of Simmons Hanly Conroy

For Nassau: Hunter Shkolnik of Napoli Shkolnik

For New York: John Oleske of the New York Attorney General’s office

For Endo: James Herschlein of Arnold & Porter; Henninger Bullock of Mayer Brown

For Teva: Nancy Patterson of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius

For Allergan: Mike Brock of Kirkland & Ellis

 

 

 

 

 

Recent Posts

Social Media Crisis Management for Trial Lawyers

Today, 4.8 billion people worldwide use the internet, and approximately 4.48 billion of those internet…

3 years ago

Michigan Woman Claims Gardasil HPV Vaccine Caused Life-Changing Injuries

The national law firm of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman has filed a lawsuit on behalf of…

3 years ago

Paraquat vs. Roundup: A Case Study

According to a June 22, 2021 court filing, Syngenta, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, and Chevron…

3 years ago

A Forward-Looking Perspective on Mass Tort Practice

As with most things, the future of mass torts will likely mimic its past. Cancer…

3 years ago

Data & Practice Hacks

A data hack affecting millions of T-Mobile customers recently came to light when on August…

3 years ago

Gender Stereotypes in Mass Torts

by Leah Rush Easterby, Contributing Editor For years, women have raised concerns over outdated and…

3 years ago