“Sargon Hearings Start January 31, 2022”
Experts Discuss Baby Food Heavy Metals Link to Autism at Jan. 31 Hearing, Led by Baum Hedlund’s Brent Wisner and Pedram Esfandiary
January 27, 2022
Pedram Esfandiary quote “The industry could make this heavy metals problem go away with relative ease if they sourced better ingredients and adequately screened their products before they reached store shelves,”
(Mass Tort News) Los Angeles, California – – A court hearing starting Monday will mark the first time that the science behind autism and heavy metals in baby food will be scrutinized under oath. Plaintiff expert witnesses, including epidemiologists, neuroscientists and toxicologists will present evidence in support of the autism link.
The four-day hearing will begin on Monday, January 31, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. in a Sargon hearing via Zoom before the Hon. Judge Amy D. Hogue for the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles and conclude on Friday, February 4 (Court is dark on February 3).
Also known as “Science Day” or “Science Week” the 4-day Sargon hearing allows the legal teams for the plaintiffs and the defendants in a lawsuit to present their experts and educate the court on the science that underpins their arguments. Sargon is the name of a California Supreme Court case that encourages trial courts to act as the gatekeeper for what scientific evidence will be admissible or precluded from trial. Judge Hogue decided that only the plaintiffs will present their experts before the court. The defense may present their experts at a later date, if necessary.
The hearing is the next step toward trial for Noah Cantabrana, a seven-year-old boy from Southern California with autism and ADHD. His parents filed the first lawsuit in the nation against baby food manufacturers alleging toxic heavy metals from baby food caused their son’s neurological injuries. They allege design defects, failure to warn and negligence, among other allegations:
R. Brent Wisner and Pedram Esfandiary of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, based in Los Angeles, represent the Cantabrana Family. They are the same lawyers from Baum Hedlund that successfully tried the first three Roundup cancer cases against Monsanto, resulting in historic verdicts for the plaintiffs.
“We believe these companies continue to show callous disregard for the health of vulnerable young children, all in the name of maximizing profits,” says attorney Pedram Esfandiary.
For more details on the toxic baby food experts and the lawsuit allegations, read more here.
Toxic Baby Food Sargon Hearing Details (Source Baum Hedlund)
Attorneys for a Southern California couple who allege toxic heavy metals in baby foods caused their minor son’s autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder (ADHD) will present their experts in a Sargon hearing via Zoom before the Hon. Judge Amy D. Hogue for the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles.
The four-day hearing will begin on Monday, January 31, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. and conclude on Friday, February 4 (Court is dark on February 3).
What is a Sargon Hearing?
A Sargon hearing allows the legal teams for the plaintiffs and the defendants in a lawsuit to present their experts and educate the court on the science that underpins their arguments. Sargon is the name of a California Supreme Court case (Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern Cal. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 747) that encourages trial courts to act as the gatekeeper for what scientific evidence will be admissible or precluded from trial.
Although a trial court will sometimes hear from both the plaintiff and defense experts, in this baby food lawsuit, Judge Hogue decided that only the plaintiffs will present their experts before the court. The defense may present their experts at a later date, if necessary.
After the hearing concludes on February 4, Judge Hogue will determine whether each expert can provide a reasonable basis for their opinion, and whether each expert’s opinion is based on “sound logic.”
If Judge Hogue finds that expert opinions are based on sound logic and valid methodologies, the case can proceed to trial and the experts are allowed to provide evidence and testimony regarding whether early life exposure to baby foods that contain lead, arsenic, and mercury causes ASD, whether exposure to lead causes ADHD, and whether that propensity for inducing ASD and ADHD caused an individual plaintiff’s ASD and/or ADHD.
First Lawsuit Over Heavy Metals in Baby Foods Causing Autism and ADHD
This litigation involves allegations that several baby food companies knowingly manufacture and sell products that contain staggering amounts of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury. Studies show that these heavy metals are known to be severe neurotoxins capable of causing lifelong brain damage and neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASD and ADHD in children.
The allegations largely stem from a February 2021 report issued by the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy Committee on Oversight and Reform U.S. House of Representatives, entitled: ‘Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels ofArsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury.’
The shocking report found that several baby food manufacturers sell products containing as much as 180 parts per billion (ppb) inorganic arsenic, 6441 ppb lead, 10 ppb mercury, and manufacture products using ingredients containing as much as 913.4 ppb arsenic, 886.9 ppb lead, and 344.55 ppb cadmium, far surpassing domestic and international regulatory standards. To help you understand how excessive that is, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established the maximum allowable levels of heavy metals in bottled water at 10 ppb inorganic arsenic, 5 ppb lead, and 5 ppb cadmium, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) capped the allowable level of mercury in drinking water at 2 ppb.
The Los Angeles, California law firm of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman filed the first case involving heavy metals in baby foods causing autism and ADHD in California state court (Case No. 21STCV22822). Plaintiffs Melissa and Lorenzo Cantabrana allege their minor son, Noah, developed ASD and ADHD after consuming substantial quantities of baby food products from the following companies, which are named defendants in the litigation:
“We believe these companies continue to show callous disregard for the health of vulnerable young children, all in the name of maximizing profits,” says attorney for the Cantabrana family, Pedram Esfandiary. “It’s been nearly a year since this explosive report was released. One would think that efforts would be made to protect kids from the known dangers of these toxic metals, but these companies have done next to nothing; they simply don’t care. This has to change, and we are confident the litigation will compensate our clients for their injuries and protect future generations from the harmful products the defendants pander as ‘food’.”
Plaintiff’s Experts in Baby Food Case
Attorneys for the plaintiffs announced the following experts participating in the hearing:
Beate Ritz, MD, Ph.D – Dr. Ritz is Professor of Epidemiology at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. She formerly served as Vice Chair and Chair of the Epidemiology Department for a decade, and hold co-appointments in Environmental Health Sciences and Neurology at the UCLA, School of Medicine. Her faculty appointment at UCLA is one of several positions specifically assigned to the Center of Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH) mandated by the State of California to conduct research, teaching, and service to communities in California on occupational and environmental health issues.
Dr. Ritz conducted a systematic review of the literature in this case and applied the Bradford Hill Criteria. She concluded that, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty:
Read the Expert Report of Dr. Beate Ritz
Michael Aschner, Ph.D – Dr. Aschner presently serves as the Harold and Muriel Block Endowed Chair and Professor of Molecular Pharmacology; Professor of Neuroscience; Professor of Pediatrics; Investigator, Rose F. Kennedy Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center; Member, Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York.
Dr. Aschner has served, and in some cases chaired, numerous national and international committees, including with National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) a branch of The Center for Disease Control (CDC), and Department of Defense (DoD), and Health Canada, among others.
Dr. Aschner conducted a systematic review of the literature in this case and applied the Bradford Hill Criteria. He concluded that, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty:
Read the Expert Report of Dr. Michael Aschner
Kevin Shapiro, MD, Ph.D – Dr. Shapiro currently serves as Medical Director and Clinical Executive for Research and Therapeutic Technologies at Cortica Healthcare, an organization which provides comprehensive assessment and therapeutic services for children with autism and other neurodevelopmental differences. He is also a member of the Neurology staff at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and an affiliate member of the Neurology staff at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego.
Dr. Shapiro is the author of 30 peer-reviewed publications, most of which focus on the neurobiology of language. He also authored the monograph “Evaluation of learning difficulty and cognitive delay” for the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice website.
Dr. Shapiro conducted a systematic review of the literature in this case and applied the Bradford Hill Criteria. He concluded that, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty:
Read the Expert Report of Dr. Kevin Shapiro
Hannah Gardener, Sc.D – Dr. Gardener has worked as an epidemiologist at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine for over 14 years. She received her Doctorate in Epidemiology, with a minor in Biostatistics from the Harvard School of Public Health. Her doctoral work focused on prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In addition to her faculty position, Dr. Gardener is also a consulting epidemiologist for several organizations including the Alzheimer’s Prevention Clinic at Cornell Medical School, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, and the Clean Label Project.
Dr. Gardener is the author of over 100 peer-reviewed manuscripts published in the medical journal. Much of her research has centered around diet and other environmental causes for neurological diseases. She has also contributed to over 100 abstracts presented at major medical conferences, and authored three book chapters, including “Pre-, Peri- and Neonatal Factors in Autism Etiology” in the Comprehensive Guide to Autism.
Dr. Gardener conducted a systematic review of the literature in this case and applied the Bradford Hill Criteria. She concluded that, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty:
Read the Expert Report of Dr. Hannah Gardener
Schedule for Toxic Baby Food Sargon Hearing
All of the hearing dates will be conducted via Zoom.
January 31, 2022
Hearing on Sargon Motions (Day 1)
9:30 a.m.
February 1, 2022
Hearing on Sargon Motions (Day 2)
1:30 p.m.
February 2, 2022
Hearing on Sargon Motions (Day 3)
1:30 p.m.
February 4, 2022
Hearing on Sargon Motions (Day 4)
9:30 a.m.
The ATSDR study confirmed that individuals who worked and resided at Camp Lejeune from 1975…
The public comment period for Rule 16.1 for multidistrict litigation (MDL) closes on February 16,…
Today, in a vote of 4-1, the FCC approved the “one to one” rule proposed…
By Christina Grube Last week, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) released their final…
By Christina Grube (MASS TORT NEWS) Yesterday, California Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo denied a…
By Christina Grube (MASS TORT NEWS) More than a month after receiving consolidation by the…